Inflation is all about the Headlines
By Tim Pierotti
Before becoming a market strategist, I spent much of my career analyzing consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies. One thing that always struck me was the lack of price wars. It’s been a very long time since Coke and Pepsi (or the red system and the blue system to industry insiders) cut prices and margins to gain share. The much more dominant behavior has been either a little bit of annual pricing or a lot of annual pricing. When commodity and transport costs rose, Coke would take more than enough price to offset the costs and so would Pepsi. I’m not accusing these companies of collusion to be clear, but my observation was one of tacit coordination. A new working paper that builds on decades of analysis illustrates that my observation in CPG is systemic across the economy. It also foretells what may be coming: a rapid increase in inflation pressures.
Businesses raise prices when they think their competition will do the same. Headlines of price shocks provide that cover. That is the (oversimplified) conclusion of a new working paper from Isabella Weber and Evan Wasner titled. “Sellers’ Inflation, Profits and Conflict: Why can Large Firms Hike Prices in an Emergency?”
Over the next few months, we are doubtless going to see headlines of companies facing cost pressures due to tariffs or rising labor costs. A headline in the Wall Street Journal this morning (11/21) reads. “An Immigration Crackdown Risks Sapping Farms’ Vital Source of Labor”. The study suggests that headlines like these allow food companies to raise prices with the assurance that they won’t be alone in doing so and thereby risk losing share. The authors write, “When these cost increases are not unique to individual firms but experienced by all competitors, firms can safely increase prices since they have a mutual expectation that all market players will do the same.”
There is a lot of academic and political debate over the impact that tariffs will have on inflation. Those that support tariffs and the President-Elect argue that tariffs will not be passed on to the consumer. They argue that countries that sell goods to the US will weaken their currencies (thereby increasing the relative value of the US Dollar) to partly offset the tax. They also argue that these tariffs are just an opening salvo in a global negotiation to “level the playing field” for global trade. Therefore, the ultimate tariff rates will be much lower than current proposals. Both of these are credible arguments and will, to some extent, offset the full implied impact of the tariffs. The problem, however, is that the administration will not and cannot control corporate pricing behavior. In other words, whether or not you think there will be real NEED for companies to pass through a tariff or not, that is secondary to whether or not they CAN. What the study informs us is that if they can, they will.
Frankly, there is less credible debate on the inflationary impact of deportations. Labor participation is at historical highs and the labor market is secularly tight. Undocumented workers, by various estimates, make up more than 50% of the labor supply in industries from housing construction and maintenance to agriculture and protein processing. Labor prices in these industries are going to go up significantly. Those costs will be unanimously passed on to consumers. We are already seeing companies signal that. Companies loathe to have their income lag their costs so they will want to price ahead of the higher labor costs that they all know is coming.
Fed Chair Powell has insisted that inflation pressures continue to ease and they have maintained their guidance for further rate cuts. The Chairman has insisted that the Fed should be dependent on the actual data and not respond to policy proposals that may be inflationary. The fact that the Ten-year yield has risen meaningfully since the Fed began cutting is the market telling Mr. Powell that he is rapidly falling behind the curve and that policy and the direction of policy is far too complacent.
Tim Pierotti is WealthVest’s Chief Investment Officer.
Tim has over 25 years of experience in various aspects of the equities business. Prior to joining WealthVest, Mr. Pierotti spent seven years in Equity Research management roles at Deutsche Bank and most recently at BMO where he was a Managing Director and Head of US Product Management. Tim has 11 years of investment experience most notably as Head of Consumer Research and Portfolio Manager at The Galleon Group, a former NY based $8Bln Long/Short hedge fund. Tim is a graduate of Boston College and lives in Summit NJ.
WealthVest makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made in this material, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of Tim as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of WealthVest and are subject to change at any time without notice. WealthVest does not have any responsibility to update this material to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this material will continue.
Statements made in this material are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed in this material, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. WealthVest does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This material does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by WealthVest.
Certain statements made in this material may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.
The S&P 500® is a trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC and its affiliates and for certain fixed index annuity contracts is licensed for use by the insurance company producer, and the related products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC or their affiliates, none of which make any representation regarding the advisability of purchasing such a product. WealthVest is not affiliated with, nor does it have a direct business relationship with Standard & Poors Financial Services, LLC.
