By Tim Pierotti

There is a lot of debate happening right now, largely along partisan lines, about whether tariffs are inflationary.  Market participants in support of the President-elect are loudly making the case that the example of the tariffs of 2018 prove that tariffs are not actually inflationary.  The Fed Staff and the economics team at Goldman Sachs have empirically demonstrated those claims to be misleading at best. The chart below from Goldman illustrates the reality of what happened last time around.  The chart shows that while broad measures of inflation showed little impact, the industries impacted by the tariffs saw meaningful inflation.

Goldman’s analysis showed that the vast majority of the imposed tariffs were passed along to US producers and to US consumers.  If you don’t trust Goldman’s analysis, you might consider reading what the staff at The Federal Reserve concluded regarding the last round of tariffs. In a 2019 working paper titled, Disentangling the Effects of the 2018-2019 Tariffs on a Globally Connected U.S. Manufacturing Sector ∗ Aaron Flaaen Federal Reserve Board Justin Pierce Federal Reserve Board.  The authors wrote,

We find that tariff increases enacted in 2018 are associated with relative reductions in manufacturing employment and relative increases in producer prices. In terms of manufacturing employment, rising input costs and retaliatory tariffs each contribute to the negative relationship, and the contribution from these channels more than offsets a small positive effect from import protection. For producer prices, the relative increases associated with tariffs are due solely to the rising input cost channel.

Beyond the fact that so many commentators are misrepresenting the 2018 example, the limited and targeted tariffs of that time bear no resemblance to what we should expect from universal tariffs directed at not just China, but at all of our major trading partners. Some of the 2018 tariffs were avoided as many Chinese made goods were rerouted and repackaged though other countries where there was no import tariff.  Avoidance isn’t an option in a universal tariff regime being proposed.

Another argument being made is that tariffs won’t be inflationary because foreign currencies like the Yuan, the Euro and the Peso will adjust lower, pushing the dollar higher, and thereby allowing the foreign producer to accept a lower price from the American importer.  This argument absolutely has merit.  I have little doubt that the US dollar will continue to make new highs vs. a basket of our trading counterparts but is the Yuan going to depreciate by 60%?  Is the Canadian dollar going to depreciate by 25%? If they do, what does that mean for US exports? It means that our exporters will have to raise prices to offset the currency losses rendering them uncompetitive.

All the economists and strategists who analyze the global economy need to approach the looming tariff war with a large dose of humility.  As Helmuth Von Moltke famously said, “The best-laid plans never survive contact with the enemy.”  There is a reason why people use the term “Trade Wars”. There are actions and there are reactions.  There will be retaliation.  How exactly will the US produce batteries and other electronics without commodities that are almost exclusively refined in China? Will this tariff regime have the impact that Smoot-Hawley did and crush global trade by two-thirds as occurred in the 1930’s? I doubt it. But we are on the precipice of a massive global economic experiment and the fact is, neither I nor anyone else knows how it will ultimately play out. That said, benign is amid the least likely.

WealthVest makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made in this material, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of Tim as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of WealthVest and are subject to change at any time without notice. WealthVest does not have any responsibility to update this material to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this material will continue.

Statements made in this material are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed in this material, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. WealthVest does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This material does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by WealthVest.

Certain statements made in this material may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.

The S&P 500® is a trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC and its affiliates and for certain fixed index annuity contracts is licensed for use by the insurance company producer, and the related products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC or their affiliates, none of which make any representation regarding the advisability of purchasing such a product. WealthVest is not affiliated with, nor does it have a direct business relationship with Standard & Poors Financial Services, LLC.