What Did We Learn This Week? (07/08)—Tim Pierotti, Chief Investment Strategist
Tim Pierotti, Chief Investment Strategist
Let’s start with what we already knew coming into this week. We knew that financial conditions have gone from historically easy to historically tight in an incredibly short period of time. We knew the Fed isn’t letting off the gas until clear signs emerge that inflation is under control. Don’t forget, that includes wage inflation. While commodities might be breaking down and that helps, the Fed is a long way from seeing the kind of labor market softening they are going to need to start jawboning to the market that they might be pulling up on rate hikes. As evidenced by the yield curve inversion, fear of an imminent recession has trumped fear of runaway inflation. The Fed is getting the results it needs, but it will need to see significantly more. So, coming into the week, we already knew the economic data would be softening and that is what we are getting. The question isn’t will housing and labor weaken, but how fast will it weaken and how bad will it get? The die has been cast. As we have said repeatedly, equity markets will bottom before the economic data does, but in our view, we are still in the early days of the economic slowdown and there are no signs that Team Powell has any intention of riding to the rescue anytime soon. The best thing that can be said about equities is that bearishness is virtually unanimous and that tends to beget countertrend rallies. Don’t chase. The process has only just begun.
To us, the more interesting question is: what will growth and inflation look like as we come out of the impending recession? On that front, our variant view is that we have a productivity problem. GDP is driven by workforce growth and productivity growth. It is entirely non-controversial to argue that the workforce growth piece is a problem for the US. The demographic issues and declining immigration are well understood and self-evident. The productivity side is the piece where we believe complacency remains and we believe one of the reasons why productivity will disappoint over the next decade is that investors in public equities have become more successfully insistent on forcing corporate management teams to return cash to shareholders versus spending on capital expenditures.
David Giroux is a CIO and Portfolio Manager at T. Rowe Price. He recently published a book titled “Capital Allocation”. In the book, he concludes, “Academic research and the historical record indicate that the average company deploys capital suboptimally…Firms tend to increase capital spending in the mid-to-late part of economic expansions—right before demand for their goods declines.” His conclusion is one that is increasingly prevalent among investors. Large hedge funds and mutual funds like T. Rowe spend millions of dollars via banks and broker dealers annually to get corporate access. Much of that money is spent to hear directly from CEO’s about how their respective businesses are faring. But there is another reason. PM’s want to look across the table at a CEO and ask one simple question: what are you going to do with the cash? Invariably, the answer they want is clear: we are going to give cash back to you Mr. Shareholder.
While that may be the right decision for individual companies, economists like Thomas Philippon and German Gutierrez assert that there is a long-term cost to the economy in the form of declining long-term productivity growth. “Firms spend a disproportionate amount of free cash flows buying back their shares.” Gutiérrez and Philippon cite increased shareholder oversight, particularly in guarding against managers’ desire to expand capital investments beyond an amount that would be in shareholders’ best interests, as well as short-termism, in which “stock-based compensation incentivizes managers to focus on short-term capital gains” via share buybacks rather than making long-term capital investments in their firm."
I'm not saying buybacks are bad. I'm simply pointing out an underappreciated fact that a powerful trend has emerged where CEO's know the easy/safe decision is to favor immediate shareholder returns over investing back in the business. Unfortunately, that trend has negative implications for the long-term growth rate of the US economy.
WealthVest makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made in this material, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of Tim as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of WealthVest and are subject to change at any time without notice. WealthVest does not have any responsibility to update this material to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this material will continue.
Statements made in this material are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed in this material, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. WealthVest does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This material does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by WealthVest.
Certain statements made in this material may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.
The S&P 500® is a trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC and its affiliates and for certain fixed index annuity contracts is licensed for use by the insurance company producer, and the related products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC or their affiliates, none of which make any representation regarding the advisability of purchasing such a product. WealthVest is not affiliated with, nor does it have a direct business relationship with Standard & Poors Financial Services, LLC.